However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On July 18, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Changwon District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking), and on September 21, 2015, by the same court, a fine of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking).

[Criminal Facts]

1. On June 18, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) and the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) (dacting driving) operated a dacting car under the influence of alcohol of about 0.082% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 10km from 10km to C in the front road located in the Grand Sea-si, Kimhae-si.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. When the Defendant: (a) was found to drive drinking on the front side of the road located in Kimhae-si B at the time of the day set forth in paragraph (1) at the time of Kimhae-si, as described in paragraph (1), while driving drinking on the road in front of the road set forth in paragraph (1) at the time of the resident registration law violation; (b) forged a private document; (c) forged a private document; and (d) forged the above investigation document; and (c) was discovered to F, he was able to avoid punishment

A. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, stating that there was no identification card, who was demanded by F to present the identification card at the above date, time, and place, and provided the said G’s resident registration number by pretending to be the said G, and used the said G’s resident registration number unlawfully.

B. The Defendant, at the above date and place, stated that the Defendant was demanded to sign the Defendant’s statement report on the circumstances of the driver’s license at the same time and place as “G” in the driver’s column, with the color-shaped package.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged one copy of the statement report on the situation of the driver in charge, which is a private document, for the purpose of uttering.

(c)

The defendant who held the above investigation document at the above time and place is aware of the forgery.