손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. If the purport of the entire argument is added to the statement in evidence No. 1, the defendant's loss compensation liability incurred, the council of occupants' representatives at the second floor of the Goyang-gu D apartment management office around September 14, 2016, which held that the defendant injured the plaintiff's honor by openly making a false fact, such as "the plaintiff has in in inhuman relations," although the plaintiffs are not in in inhuman relationships," and the defendant injured the plaintiff's honor by using a similar method at the same place on October 1, 2016, respectively. The defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the above tort.
2. The scope of liability for damages is clear in light of the empirical rule that the Plaintiffs suffered mental pain due to defamation or harmful act by the Defendant. As such, the Defendant is liable to compensate for the Plaintiffs’ emotional distress in money.
With regard to the amount of consolation money, the consolation money of KRW 1,00,000 shall be recognized to each of the plaintiffs, in consideration of various circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, including the following: (a) the background of the tort such as the dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendant; (b) the defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,000,000 for the above tort; and (c) the defendant has repeatedly
3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. Since the part of the judgment of the court of first instance different from this conclusion is unfair, it is revoked partially by the defendant's appeal and dismissed the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revoked part. Since the remaining part of the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, the defendant's remaining appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition