2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a holder of the passenger car B.

(1) On November 21, 201, the Defendant subscribed to mandatory insurance: (1) on the front side of the Seosan-dong, Seosan-dong, Seosan-gu, Seosan-gu, Seosan-dong, ② on January 16, 2012, on the front side of the Kusan-dong, Seosan-dong, Seosan-gu, Seosan-dong, Seosan-dong, and ③ on March 7, 2012, around 16:4: (4) on the front side of the Seodong-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, 201; (5) on the front side of the Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, 201, on the 20-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, 14:21 around 20, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into non-insurance operation vehicles, inquiry into compulsory insurance contracts, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Motor Vehicle Registration Register;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the main text of Article 46(2)2 and the main text of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act (Amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015; Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012); Articles 46(2) and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act (Amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 2, 2012; Act No. 11369, Jan. 2, 2015);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances, such as the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances of sentencing as indicated in the record.

Defendant is led to confession, and is against himself.

The defendant is currently suffering from brain disease, and rehabilitation treatment at a hospital.