On June 10, 2017, at around 17:29, the Defendant asserted B with B on the ground that he was aboard a taxi operated by B and was not in operation as required by the Defendant in the vicinity of the city north-gu, Busan, and that B reported 112.

The defendant sent to the scene after receiving a report 112 and explained the circumstances of the case to the police officer belonging to the Busan Police Station D District District, who was sent to the scene, sent the chest of the above E one time by hand without any justifiable reason. After hearing the circumstances of the case from the above E, the defendant requested the defendant to present his identification card, the defendant sent the chest part of the above E two times by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. The sentence is to be imposed in consideration of the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing (the scope of recommended punishment in accordance with the sentencing guidelines) of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and Article 136(1) of the Selection of Punishment Act [the scope of recommended punishment]; (b) the basic area (f) type 1 (f) (f) and (f) (f) the obstruction of performance of official duties; (c) the necessity for strict punishment; and (d) the defendant has a criminal record of suspended execution due to the obstruction of performance of special duties; and (d) the sentence is to be imposed in consideration of the criminal defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment is to be determined