When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Damage to property;

A. On April 2, 2016, at around 23:40 on April 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) damaged the victim’s property so that the victim’s property can be damaged by cutting off the inner glass in the restaurant (x 50cm in width) by drinking in the front place while the Defendant fighting with the customer seated on the side; (b) the customer and the horse fighting.

B. At around 23:50 on the same day, the Defendant, without any particular reason, damaged the said car to cover repair costs of KRW 446,475, respectively, on the following grounds: (a) GObain owned by the said EM3 vehicle, which was parked next to the GOba in the vehicle’s management by the victim F; and (b) the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, damaged the said car to cover repair costs of KRW 446,475.

2. On April 3, 2016, at around 00:0, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the prevention and suppression of the police officer’s crime by assaulting the police officer’s right bridge, on the ground that the police officer, who was dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant broken a restaurant glass, arrested the Defendant as a current offender at the patrol box, and the police officer, who was called out.

3. Whether the Defendant wishes to kill the victim M, who is the police officer, at the police box of the above JJ around the day and around the day specified in the above paragraph 2, among two persons, including civil petitioners L.

It shall be thrown away from a dog to death.

It is not the 6th day of bitch bitch bitch.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “.......”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Written statements, C, F, H, L, and N;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs to victims;

1. Article 136(1), Article 366, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (Interference with the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines (the defendant is the first offender, and the victims are restored to their original offenders).