beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.31 2019구합65918

장애연금지급결정처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of a disability pension and Defendant’s entitlement to a disability pension 1) Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of the first disability pension, etc., and the Plaintiff re-entered to the National Pension on October 1, 1999, and on December 31, 2013, the Mali-de lusium to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant disease”).

3) On the ground that a disability pension claim is filed (hereinafter “the primary disability pension claim”)

A) However, on March 18, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff does not constitute a disability pension beneficiary on the ground that the instant disease was not a disease that occurred during the period of coverage of the National Pension Scheme (hereinafter “decision on March 18, 2014”).

(2) On December 19, 2017, the Plaintiff again filed a claim for the payment of a disability pension (hereinafter “the second disability pension claim”) with the Defendant on December 19, 2017, including the Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of the second disability pension.

On the other hand, the defendant filed a second claim against the same disability injury as the previous claims, and made a decision on the eligibility of disability pension recipients on the ground that it is not subject to disability examination.

On March 19, 2018, the Plaintiff appealed and filed a request for examination with the Defendant on March 19, 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to partially accept the Plaintiff’s request to the effect that even if the Plaintiff filed a request for re-determination of the same disability-related disease, it should be determined whether

As a result of the review on June 19, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to the effect that the Plaintiff does not constitute a beneficiary of a disability pension on the ground that the instant disease was not a disease that occurred during the period of coverage of the National Pension Scheme (hereinafter referred to as “decision on June 19, 2018”).

B. On June 19, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a revocation lawsuit against the Defendant around August 2018, as Suwon District Court No. 2018Guhap1634, Jun. 19, 2018.