The Defendant, on June 13, 2016, 2016, 335, called “Eel” 602 of the victim D’s operation in Osan City, 06:50, on June 13, 2016, called “F,” and called “the three-dimensional pressure is so why the three-dimensional pressure is above.”

Although the air conditioning stipulated that the water ice is ice and drinking water, the said F did not take any measure and instead did not cut off the word.

As a result, the Defendant, at around 07:30 on the same day, had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, attached a string with a single-use dog, which was located in the 602 heading room on the same day, and had the said strings by attaching a fire to the string part of the stringed string, in order to overcome the string of the strings, the Defendant got off the said strings by attaching a fire to the part of the stringed string of the said strings.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the Maurel employees, which is about KRW 20,000,000 to repair the Maurel.

"2016 Gohap 359"

1. While the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a stimulative disorder, at around June 14, 2016, the “I convenience store operated by the victim H located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 08:5 on June 14, 2016.” From the above convenience store up to February 2016, the Defendant retired from work as an employee, but the Defendant retired from office until February 2, 2016, but was unre-employmentd, he was fluenced, and destroyed by breaking the display site, and destroyed by breaking the attached goods, which were displayed, and damaged the property equivalent to KRW 1,052,80 in total, such as the market price of the display site, chair, goods, etc. owned by the victim.

2. While the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, the Defendant’s “L convenience store operated by the Victim K in the South-dong, South-dong, East-gu, Chungcheongnam-si on June 14, 2016,” and the Defendant’s past convenience store.