2. The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged lies in the statements of the injured party D in this court and in the investigative agency and in this court of E, a witness, and the fact that the accused and the injured party became aware of the peace is indirectly supported by the facts charged.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, D and E’s statement to the effect that the Defendant committed an assault against D on the date and time indicated in the facts charged is difficult to believe, and other evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant committed an assault against D on the date and time indicated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

A. D, in an investigative agency and this court, “Around 09:50 on March 16, 2016, the opening of the dog was obstructed, and therefore, D was faced with the opening of the Defendant, and as a result, the Defendant was able to have a stone.

At the time, the defendant did not affix a photo.

“A statement was made to the effect that “E visited D’s house at the same time” in this court, and “E visited D’s house to see at the same time, but this study examines that D’s house was frighted to D, and D’s house was frighted to D, and it was frighted by D.

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

B. On the other hand, the Defendant consistently denied the Defendant’s crime of having taken the victim’s house at the time of this court’s investigation agency’s filing of the charge until this court’s filing of the charge. However, the Defendant consistently denied the Defendant’s filing of the victim’s house and photo.

(c)

However, there is a problem.