beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.15 2017나305537

보험금

Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation part.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment (including attached Form) except for the repair or deletion of the relevant part as follows.

2. Parts used or deleted;

A. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the second to third to 11 of the surface 19 shall be added as follows.

Article 17(1) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Health Insurance Contract of this case and Article 3(1) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Health Insurance Contract of this case as "if the physical part of the body is lost, or the function thereof is permanently lost," and Article 17(2) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Health Insurance Contract of this case and Article 3(2) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Health Insurance of the General Conditions Concerning the Health Insurance of this case, Article 17(2) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Health Insurance of this case and Article 3(2) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Health Insurance of the General Conditions

In light of the above facts, in interpreting Article 17(2) of the General Terms and Conditions concerning the Physical Injury and Article 3(2) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Physical Injury, Article 17(1) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Physical Injury and Article 3(1) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Physical Injury and Article 3(1) of the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Physical Injury and the General Terms and Conditions Concerning the Physical Injury, it is reasonable to view that the subject of the payment of the insurance benefit for the physical disability in accordance with the insurance contract of this case is limited to "the case of loss of part of the body" or "the case of loss of the territorial disability."

However, according to the result of the physical appraisal commission for Daegu University Hospital and the result of the appraisal supplementation commission, the plaintiff is three years.