“A police officer was engaged in criminal conduct, and exercised his/her authority by misrepresenting himself/herself as a police officer.

[2016 Highest 5528] On December 03, 2011, the Defendant, even though drinking in the “E cafeteria” of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, had the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, and had the victim F, the business owner of which would be paid as if he did not pay the said value. The Defendant obtained the amount equivalent to KRW 31,00,000, by taking the alcohol of the total amount of KRW 31,00,000, such as 1,000, 201, 201.

Judgment

The defendant denies the defendant's birth G in relation to the facts charged of this case, and this is examined.

On December 3, 2011, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record: ① the instant facts charged against the Defendant was discovered and discovered in the street located in the Gu, including the restaurant located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, but around December 2016, the need police was judged by requesting a trial of non-revision; ② immediately after the service of the judgment, the Defendant came to know of the contents of the judgment, that is, the Defendant came to know of the judgment; ② at the time of the crime of non-maration, the victim stated to the effect that at the time of the crime of the crime of fraud, the victim was not a male, and thus, the Defendant would be aware of the appearance of the judgment; ③ At the time of the crime of false-maration, C, the other party as the police officer, he/she was disqualified with the police officer at this court; ③ At the time of his/her qualification as the police officer, he/she was not aware of the fact that he/she was aware of the appearance of the Defendant; ③ At the time of the crime of non-maration, he/she was not aware of five minutes.