except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around September 27, 2012, the Defendant, as the chairperson of the U.S. Si’s U.S. measure headquarters, applied for the provision of subsidies of KRW 49,90,00 to the victims of the U.S.A. for the purpose of the provision of subsidies for the five-year post management period specified in the terms and conditions of the granting of subsidies, when the Defendant applied for the provision of subsidies of KRW 49,90,00 to the victims of the U.S. under the pretext of the purchase to harvest, dispose of, and dispose of, the rice that all crops of D have been contaminated and disposed of at the (i.e., the (ii) city E in the Gu-U.S.A.A. due to the leakage of gas from the end of December 27, 2012.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not intend to use the said compacter for harvesting or discarding rice, or for storing it for five years, on the ground that the Defendant disposed of the compacter immediately after purchasing the said subsidy and intended to use it in division with the village residents.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received a decision to grant subsidies on February 1, 2013 on the day from the victim, and acquired the above subsidies by means of having the Defendant pay 49,900,000 won directly to the Daedong Industries Agency, which purchased the single compact.

This part of the facts charged is modified in accordance with the facts found by each evidence of the judgment. The summary of the evidence

1. The protocol of interrogation of the Defendant by the prosecution against the Defendant (in particular, at the beginning of December 2012, the residents were supported by one compacter in neighboring Dongdong G, and we expressed that two support were provided and sold, and that there was a opinion that the price was sold and divided into two, but the consent was given to most of the persons, and the statement about the time of acceptance, use after acceptance, time of disposition, etc. of the compacter in the holding

1. The witness H’s legal statement that takes part of the compacter’s money before receiving the compacter’s support is wrong.