beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.09.13 2015가단22343

물품대금

Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 46,459,969 for the Plaintiff and KRW 20% per annum from June 30, 2015 to September 30, 2015 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts [The grounds for recognition: The defendant's assertion is not accepted since there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (the defendant's written confirmation of the balance of evidence No. 3) is alleged to have obtained the plaintiff's deception and affixed a balance certificate, but the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to recognize the above deception.

(ii) evidence Nos. B 1, 3, and 19; witness D’s testimony; the purpose of the entire pleadings

A. The Plaintiff operates wholesale and retail business, such as paint, with the trade name of “E”, and the Defendant operates a vehicle maintenance service business with the trade name of “F”.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant sold a paint on credit between the Defendant and the Defendant, and the Defendant subsequently traded it by paying the credit amount later.

C. According to the account books prepared by the Plaintiff while engaging in credit transactions with the Defendant, ① the credit amount of KRW 35,854,563 on July 8, 2013 was paid by the Defendant 2,195,649 on the same day; ② the credit amount of KRW 33,543,353; ② the credit amount of KRW 36,53,756 on August 9, 2013 was 36, and the remaining amount of KRW 2,651,896 on August 12, 2013 was 2,630,000, KRW 139,574 on credit amount of KRW 250,000, KRW 139,576 on credit amount of KRW 250,000, KRW 1365,000 on credit amount of KRW 31,50 on credit amount of KRW 20,000,000 on March 14, 2013.