beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.02.19 2014고합261

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(허위세금계산서교부등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years and fine for negligence of 8,00,000,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Incheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 21, 2014.

The defendant of "2014 Gohap 261" is the actual operator of D, the father of the defendant in Kimpo-si B, Kimpo-si, who is the representative of D.

Around July 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) purchased a large volume of waste iones from the upper end of the water, and (b) sold them to the wholesalers, such as E (hereinafter “E”), through D; and (c) did not have received any supply of waste ions from the purchasing partners, such as F, etc., the Defendant submitted to the tax office through the electronic declaration a list of total sum of the purchase accounts for each year of January 2013, 2013, stating that the Defendant purchased waste ions equivalent to KRW 22,289,212,00 from the F and six enterprises, such as F, and F, as in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

The defendant 2015 Gohap 42 is the person who operates the H of the scrap metal Do and the retail company in Ilyang-si G of Ilyang-si, Ilyang-si.

The Defendant, at the Yangyang Tax Offices around July 25, 2013, for profit-making purposes, supplied 5 companies totaling KRW 6,607,164,370, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes, such as: (a) the Defendant, in large volume, purchased the waste glass from the fests of solid scrap; (b) the fact only sold it to the wholesalers or refiners through H; and (c) the Defendant, in the absence of the supply of waste glass to the Company I, entered as if he supplied the waste glass equivalent to KRW 1,83,683,270, in addition to the attached Table of Crimes (2).

A list of accounts on separate tax invoices on which false statements were made was submitted.

The Defendant of 2015 Gohap 193 established K on the ground of the actual operator of K in his/her own name and the representative L in his/her name, and established K, which is a one-person coal business, and did not actually supply the closed Dong to the M, a one-person signboard business entity, etc., but issued a high-amount tax invoice under the name of K and purchased materials from the signboard business entity.