1. On August 3, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around 09:45 on August 3, 2016, in E operated by the victim D D in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu around August 3, 2016, the Defendant laid off the cremation located on the top of the back line in which the victim would have made a tobacco to the knitter by changing the fladr tobacco 2 universale.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around August 4, 2016, around 10:30 on August 4, 2016, 201: (b) around 10:30, the Victim G of the Incheon East-gu Seoul East-gu Seoul East-gu Seoul East-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-style District Court Decision 90,50,50,500 won in a single eye in order to collect cremation; and (c) caused the victim to cut off the re-cremate in which the victim was equipped with tobacco in the carter.

On the other hand, the victim was stolen from 90,000 Modern tobacco equivalent to the market value of 90,000, which is owned by another victim.The summary of the evidence was the summary of the evidence.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of G and D

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. On July 21, 2016, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and two years of suspended execution at the Incheon District Court on July 21, 2016, and on July 29 of the same month, the defendant committed the same re-offending at approximately one week after the judgment became final and conclusive, and thus, the defendant is sentenced to the punishment

In determining the term of punishment, the circumstances mentioned above should be taken into consideration, but the amount of damage and the fact that the defendant recognized the crime were also taken into account.