beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2014.01.08 2013고정563

건축법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2012, the Defendant had built a new temple B and C in the original city of the Republic of Korea.

1. The Defendant violated the Building Act, even though he reported that three buildings were constructed with a 160.80 square meters per 160 square meters per 181.70 square meters per 196.70 square meters per 196.0 square meters per 196.0 square meters per 196.16 square meters per 136.16 square meters per 1, per 1,200 head of the original city.

Accordingly, the defendant constructed a building differently from the reported content without reporting the change to the original Mayor.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, cut the B’s land around 2.2m, cut up the land of about 3.5m, filled up the land of about 3.5m in the original city, he stored the stone in the said site, 703m square meters in a asphalt, and laid down aggregate on the 1,337m square meters in the original city.

Accordingly, the Defendant performed development activities differently from the permitted matters without obtaining permission for development activities from the original liquor market.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation books, written statements at will, modified contents, work progress table, area map, and photograph book;

1. Article 110 subparagraph 2 of Article 110 of the Building Act, Article 16 (1) of the same Act, Article 140 subparagraph 1 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, and Article 56 (2) and Article 56 (1) of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (the point of failing to obtain permission for alteration of development activities, the selection of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;