특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On November 17, 199, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and on February 5, 2008, received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Busan District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on February 5, 2008, and on May 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Incheon District Court Branch of the Incheon District Court on June 5, 2015.
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bone Star Co., Ltd.
On September 14, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license at around 09:40 on September 14, 2014, driven the above passenger car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.206%, which was difficult to drive normally, and led to the U.S. to drive a five-lane road near the North Korean Peninsula in Kimpo-si, according to the one-lane as the reinforcement side in Seoul, while driving the said passenger car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.206%.
On the other hand, there was an intersection where a sign was installed to make a walk for the pedestrian signal, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent the accident from hindering the normal traffic of other motor vehicles by making a internship only for the pedestrian signal to the driver of the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting the above duty of care, received the front right part of the DNA car driven by the victim C (year 41) who was holding the intersection due to the negligence of violating the signal by making a green e-mail with the e-mail, and thereby was driven by the victim C (year 41) who was holding the intersection in accordance with the signals.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E (the victim E (the 37-year old age), such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and on the part of the victim E (the 37-year age), who was on board the car of the Karen.