However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On April 8, 2017, the Defendant was under influence of alcohol in the C restaurant located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on April 06:40, 2017. On the ground that, upon receiving a report from 112 to the effect that “the two customers are self-employed,” the Defendant sent to the site by the head of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station D District Hospital E, which was dispatched to the site, has broken the Defendant’s and the Defendant’s daily behaviors, and the Defendant “I mar the police officer’s kik kik who will do so” to the above E.

She was located in a restaurant for one-time, which is why she can see and grow.

“In the expression of “,” etc., assaulted the face of the above E with his own head, such as taking the face of the E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order, such as handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police victim to E;

1. Application of statutes to a statement of witnesses prepared in the F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is divided in depth and has no record of being punished by a relatively minor fine, etc.);