If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On January 23, 2013, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of Hegel to B Hegel from the front of the gelgel road located in the Hegelan-gun of the Chungcheongbuk-gun under the influence of alcohol content of 0.211% by blood alcohol level around 19:13, 201.

2. On January 23, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., accident-free measures) (e., accident-free measures) was driving the said Hegel driver’s vehicle on the front of Hegel loan located in Hegel-dong, Soung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service would have well look at the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and caused the part of the front part of the said gelf driver's car which the victim C is under a stop in the later bank due to the negligence of the defendant's negligence.

The Defendant, at the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above low-priced car to be equivalent to KRW 428,237 of the repair cost, and escaped without taking any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver (22 pages of investigation records);

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148, 54 (1), 148-2 (2) 1, and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;