beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.02.08 2016나23306

아파트명도

Text

1. The proceedings of an independent party intervenor whose exchange has been changed or added in the trial shall be all dismissed;

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A, B, C, D, F, and the Intervenor and K, L, N,O, Q, and P shared the land of 678 square meters in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 18, 2005 (the land before subdivision was divided into 660 square meters and U 18 square meters on the land; hereinafter “instant land”) and agreed to implement a reconstruction project (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”) that newly constructs one apartment unit and one commercial building on the instant land and one building on the land of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 1999, by sharing it.

B. On February 24, 200, 12 owners of the reconstruction project of this case concluded a contract for construction works with the Sinsi Construction Company on February 24, 2000 for the said project, and cancelled the contract. On May 25, 2001, 1,794,650,000 won for construction works with the Sinsi General Construction Company and the construction cost, and from June 10, 2001 to May 31, 2002 during the construction period, 12 owners of the reconstruction project of this case concluded a contract for construction works with the owner of the building of this case to pay 34,00,000 won for each household in lieu of the payment of the above construction cost.

C. On May 10, 2001, Plaintiff E received shares on the instant land, etc. by inheritance by consultation and division. X was awarded the same shares as Q on June 24, 2002; on August 20, 2002, Plaintiff G sold it to M; on July 4, 2002, Plaintiff G received the same shares from husband P, who was the husband on July 4, 2002; on April 2005, the owner of the instant reconstruction project made a report on the change to Plaintiff E, G, and M.

On May 20, 2003, the plaintiffs and K, L, X, and N are the second to fifth floors from the second to the fifth floor to the attending building owners, while continuing to allocate housing units to the apartment to be completed as the reconstruction project of this case (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").