However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 25, 2017, from around 21:00 to around 21:20, the Defendant had been engaged in the “hule” game with the victim D (48 taxes) at the second floor of C Company 2 located in Masung City B, and had the victim’s face two times in drinking, the victim’s face is resisted by two times in drinking, and the defendant’s face is resisted by one time in drinking, and the defendant continued to go beyond the victim’s face, and continued to go beyond the victim’s face, and went beyond the victim’s face, makes it possible for the victim to take care of about five weeks. As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim by taking care of the victim’s head, such as a falsium, falming, external bale, bale, and bale, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part concerning D statements in the second interrogation protocol against the defendant during the police officer's second interrogation protocol

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A transcript;

1. Photographs of parts damaged by D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis certificate (No. 19,20 No. 50);

1. For a person subject to special aggravated punishment in the basic area (from April to January to June) of the first type of bodily injury (the scope of recommended punishment) under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts and Article 257(1) of the choice of punishment (the choice of imprisonment) of the Criminal Act: The person subject to special aggravated punishment (the decision of sentence) is not subject to punishment (the decision of sentence] of the crime in this case is that the defendant committed an injury by exercising violence against a victim of sexual appearance, and the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak, and the degree of violence used by the defendant and the degree of injury inflicted on the victim is not easy.

However, as the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, the defendant seems to have reached the crime of this case as a result of contingent attachment with the victim, the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, the fact that the defendant was first offender, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing stated in the records, such as the circumstances after the crime.