사기방조
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (two years of suspended execution, observation of protection, and community service for 120 hours in prison in October) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the court below and the sentencing of the court below is not beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, it is desirable to respect such a change (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). No particular change in circumstances can be found in the matters that are the conditions of sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and in full view of various circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, the course and form of the instant crime, and the history of the instant crime, etc., the court below’s sentencing was too unfilled and so it exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion
subsection (b) of this section.
We do not accept the prosecutor's improper argument of sentencing.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.