When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 5, 2014, the Defendant, at around 13:11, connected the Defendant’s residence to AD (E) “C” on the Internet NVER QnA bulletin board, and “F must have access to it.” This title “I have the same mind that I have been operating from the president to the employees at a low level as I have no elementary school but to the employees. I sell the same money, and I have the same mind. D. Full fraud group. It is changed to the complete fraud group. I have this point: “The difference between F and E” from 13:12 on the same day to 5:0, I have the same mind that “I have no longer been changed to 6:0 p.m. to 10 p.m. to 5:0 p.m., I have publicly replaced and changed to 6:0 p.m. to 6:0 p.m., “I have no choice but to 3:0 p.m., I have no choice but to 6:0 p.m. to 1.m.,”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A complaint (including a separate document) ( even if there is a complaint for the service related to the goods on the part of the victim, it cannot be deemed that the act of posting several times by changing only the title, such as the statement in the ruling, on the Internet camera with a large ripple power to consumers, does not go against social rules.)