점포명도
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasons for the entry in this case are as follows: “20 square meters inside the ship indicated in Section 1-A of the order” in Section 12 of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as “20 square meters inside the ship which connects each point of the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list, < by Presidential Decree No. 20 square meters in sequence among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list; Presidential Decree No. 20 square meters in the ship which connects each point in the attached Table 20 square meters in sequence; Presidential Decree No. 3 “Sa
The defendant's above assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's deception and obstruction of business.
It is not sufficient to acknowledge that the instant sub-lease contract is a significantly unfair contract or a contract concluded by the plaintiff's deception only with the entries of subparagraph 2-1 to 4 of the evidence No. 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. The Defendant's assertion that there is no obligation to pay rent, etc. on the premise that there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff interfered with the Defendant's new business.
"Each dismissal is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for each dismissal, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is so dismissed as per Disposition.