beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.24 2016고단2978 (1)

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On November 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on the 12th of the same month by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic law at the Suwon Friwon, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 12th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 1, 2015, the Defendant held the right to sell a commercial site in the said district to the victim D’s real estate office located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul.

The above rights will be transferred in the amount of KRW 45 million.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant did not have the right to purchase a commercial site because it was discovered that the Defendant was determined by the Korea Land and Housing Corporation as the subject of the E District Living Countermeasures around July 8, 2010 and that the Defendant made a false report on July 11, 2013 and the status of the subject was revoked.

On July 2, 2015, the Defendant was granted KRW 40 million under the pretext of taking over the right by deceiving the victim as such and deducting KRW 5 million from the victim.

2. On December 12, 2015, the Defendant, at a real estate office where the trade name in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, is unknown, the Defendant held the right to sell the site of the commercial building in the said district to the victim G.

The phrase “a loan of the thesis to be provided as security” was false.

However, the defendant did not have the right to sell a commercial site as stated in the above Paragraph 1.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 10 million in cash from the victim to the head of the Tong under the name of the Defendant, who was the child of the Defendant on the same day as the loan money, and received KRW 8 million in cash.

3. On January 14, 2016, the Defendant, along with I and the victimJ at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 2 above, has the right to sell the commercial site in the said district, which was determined as the object of the measure against the global life of the said district.

4.