A. The Plaintiff’s request for the acquisition and transportation of helicopter 1) around October 2015, the Plaintiff, a company affiliated with the Plaintiff in Japan (hereinafter “D”).

2) Through B, a mid-term and long-term helicopter owned by a Japanese fire station (name of goods: AS365N2, 1997; hereinafter “instant helicopter”).

F. F. F. F. F. F. F. (hereinafter referred to as “F.”) a helicopter repair firm located in California, California.

) On November 13, 2015, the instant helicopter was requested to repair the instant helicopter. F is omitted from USD 83,848.58 (hereinafter “U.S.”) at the expense of the Plaintiff for the readjustment of the instant helicopter.

(2) On November 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) transported the instant helicopter located in the Defendant Company B (hereinafter “B”) in Japan to F, and upon completion of the maintenance work, again requested the instant helicopter to the Busan port in the Republic of Korea.

On November 16, 2015, Defendant B sent a quotation stating “FRM TO TYO TYO TYO OTRD”, “FRM OGKD TPP TPPND TPPPUSN”, “Maritime FaresRD 55,00,00”, and “OCAL expenses” may vary depending on MAIN BOD YY.

3) Defendant B’s marine transportation from the Japanese Hacoa of the instant helicopter to the west Port of the United States to the west Port of the United States of America is a Japanese transportation chain G company (G; hereinafter “G”).

Corporation (H; hereinafter referred to as “H”) of the United States of America with respect to land transportation from the United States of America to F

G was requested to the ASEAN. G re-Korean corporation (hereinafter referred to as "I") for the maritime transport from the ASEAN to the United States of America.

H requested L through K, which is a type of crowdfunding business, J, a type of truck distribution business entity, and H requested L to transport land from the U.S. Orcland to F.

B. Defendant B, who entered into a maritime cargo insurance contract by Defendant B, on November 23, 2015, is Defendant C.