When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is disadvantageous to the president of the Dental Institute, who is the president of the Dental Institute and is called “E”.

1. Definating victims F;

A. On February 24, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by publicly insulting the victim on the ground that the victim F (the age of 54) who is the head of the pertinent administrative office of the pertinent school claimed the expenses incurred in employing the DH and directors I in the president of the D Institute Office located in the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, for the reason that he claimed the expenses incurred in employing the D Institute Teachers without claiming the expenses for the employment of the D Institute Teachers.

B. At around 14:20 on March 17, 2014, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim F by saying, “A victim F was under investigation as to why the instant school principal H and name-free students would d middle school entrance in Gwangju Mine-gu would d middle school entrance, and is doing so, as to why she would incur any fluoral documents, and is doing so.” The Defendant said the victim F of the victim F of the victim’s patent by saying, “Is the Domine, Is the Domine, Is the Domine, Is the Domine, Is the Domine, Is the Domine.”

2. On March 18, 2014, at around 16:20 on March 18, 2014, the Defendant insultd the victim J, the assistant principal of the said school, the victim J (the 58 years of age), stating to the effect that the Defendant “it should be held that the Defendant would be responsible for giving a letter of apology, and that it should be held that the Defendant would be responsible for giving a letter of apology to the victim J, the assistant principal of the said school, and that the Defendant would not properly give a letter of apology to the Doar gue in this case.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to the F and J;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;