When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 18, 2016, at around 10:30 on July 18, 2016, the Defendant had consulted the victim and the Defendant’s wife E with the victim who is the director of the above hospital at the examination and treatment room operated by the victim D in Busan Nam-gu, Busan, for the following reasons: (a) considering that E had received several medical treatments, he did not take part in the treatment room; and (b) in this regard, he took a bath and reflect with the victim, i.e., “the sound inside this fatt is being fatt,” and ii) took a large amount of the victim’s character, i.e., “the sound inside this fatt is fatt,” and ii) took part in the clinic, i.e., the hospital head, F and the water treatment physician G, and (c) took part in the clinic and waiting room.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the operation of the victim hospital by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the results of the analysis of video recording and recording files submitted by the F of a victim);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, at the same time, at the same time and place as stated in the facts charged; (b) on the above background, assaulted the victims on the part of the victim F (the age of 47) who was the chief of the hospital who avoided the disturbance and avoided the disturbance, and on the part of the victim F (the age of 47) who was the chief of the hospital who was the head of the hospital who controlled the disturbance, several times, such as drinking and hand-on the chest of the victim G (the age of 42)

2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victims want to punish the defendant through a written agreement on November 16, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case.