However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who drives CCA110 Obba.

At around 15:30 on April 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the above Oba, and proceeded at a speed below the front of the Women's Center in the Geumju-si, Geumju-si, in the direction of the gold village from the boundary of the police station in the Pju-si to the direction of the gold village.

At that time, the crosswalk is installed and the pedestrians are crossing the crosswalk, so the person engaged in driving service was obliged to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk and prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not temporarily stop and tried to build the crosswalks to the right side from the left side of the Roman course to the right side without temporarily stopping the victim's D (the age of 68) and shocked the victim in front of the earth.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as cerebral dystrophism and dystrophism, from the victim’s occupational negligence for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. provides that the basic area ( April to October) of the first type of traffic accident (the term "accident resulting from traffic accident") shall be limited to the defendant's recommendation for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Order to Attend, and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., where the defendant was driving a Ortotoba, and the accident of this case was committed because the defendant did not find an elderly victim, and the accident of this case was committed because the accident of this case was serious, the degree of the victim's injury is serious, but the defendant did not agree with the victim, and the defendant is in depth against the defendant's confession, liability insurance is subscribed, the primary offender is the defendant's age, character and behavior