beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.31 2017나596

손해배상

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff was in charge of the center for senior citizens in Busan Dong-gu E-gu (hereinafter “instant center for senior citizens”); Defendant B was in charge of the audit of the above center for senior citizens; Defendant C was in charge of the above center for senior citizens; Defendant D is a member of the above center for senior citizens.

Around May 7, 2014, F, who was the president of the instant center for senior citizens, was a member of the center for senior citizens, and even though the Plaintiff did not appropriate the funds for the center for senior citizens under the pretext of oral gift, the Plaintiff’s honor by openly pointing out false facts as if the operating expenses of

However, the Defendants: (a) conspired with each other to attract the Plaintiff at the instant senior citizen center; (b) did not publicly indicate false facts; (c) asked the Plaintiff about the details of the cash book; and (d) signed the confirmation document stating that the Plaintiff prepared the cash book to F for the purpose of entering the account book; and (c) signed the confirmation document stating as if the actual amount was different from the actual amount; and (d) did not interfere with the criminal trial against F; and (e) did not have

B. On May 2014, Defendant B discovered documents on the Plaintiff’s books and copied them, and submitted to an investigation agency a false statement to the effect that Defendant B would return them to the Plaintiff’s books.

C. Around May 2, 2014, Defendant C interfered with the lectures at the time of the recreation in the center for senior citizens’ clubs of this case, and insulting the Plaintiff by taking a bath while its members are in compliance with the report.

Defendant D had been present as a witness in a defamation criminal case against F and perjury.

E. As such, the Plaintiff suffered mental damage by the tort committed by the Defendants, the Defendants are obligated to pay 3 million won each as compensation for mental damage suffered by the Plaintiff.

2. We examine the judgment, and the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is a tort as alleged by the Defendants.