except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 10:00 on April 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses “I am back to the driver’s seat without getting off from the police box affiliated with the above police box, who called “I see that I would not pay the taxi fee because I would like to do so; (b) I see the words “I am back to the taxi because I would like to pay the taxi fee”; and (c) I see that I am “I am back to the taxi because I would have calculated the fare,” from F in the circumstances where I am back to the above E and the above police box, I would like to go back to the above E and F.

Accordingly, the above Eul et al.: (a) followed the Defendant’s petitioned the Defendant; (b) the Defendant called the above police box in accordance with the above Eul et al.; (c) carried the booms that had been brought to the said F to the said box; and (d) carried the f’s chest by carrying the f, carrying the f’s chest by hand; and (c) carried the f’s chest by hand, and (d) carried the f’s clothes, such as a f’s shoulder, and f’s shoulder, carried the f’s shoulder, and f’s shoulder, f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s s

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials regarding civil petitions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of CCTV-recording area-cape photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties shall be the category 1 (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties).

2. The defendant who has rendered a ruling of sentence shall be the police officers.