Judgment

The fact that the defendant repents his mistake and reflects his mistake, the degree of injury of the victim E (the two weeks' treatment in each case) is not serious, and the fact that it is the situation that the mother should support as the most favorable.

However, each of the crimes of this case is deemed to have been committed by assaulting victims on the ground that the defendant was in distress, and the quality of the crime is not good in light of the method of crime, the defendant was punished several times for the same crime, and the victim E was punished several times for the same crime, in particular, each of the crimes of this case has been repeated even during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and the victims have not been agreed to up to now, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the pronouncement of the judgment below, and there is no change in the circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing, and there is no other special circumstance or circumstance that the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstance and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., all of the sentencing conditions in this case, such as the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee, and the sentencing range (6 months to six months) of the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee [the scope of general injury recommendation for victim C] No. 1 (2) year or more of general injury [the scope of aggravated punishment for victim]

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.