beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단2402

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2014, at around 22:10, the Defendant driven Lone Star and Lone Star, and driven the three-lanes in front of the SK station in the same manner as the city of the city of the city of the city of the Gu, using three-lanes of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the

At the same time, it was not easy to secure the front view at night, and the victim D (80 years of age) was in the front line of the same lane and was sitting in the divided and sitting, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and properly operate the steering and operating the steering system.

However, the Defendant, while neglecting the above duty of care, was caused by the negligence of driving the vehicle as it was, by the Defendant, a victim.

At around 23:39 of the same day, the Defendant caused the death of a victim, who was receiving medical treatment at a medical hospital, due to the above occupational negligence, due to the cerebral cerebral cerebral dyssis caused by double dynassis.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. A death diagnosis report and a written record of autopsy;

1. On-the-spot photographs (No. 18 to 22 of the evidence records), on-site photographs and hard booms (Evidence No. 43 to 59 of the evidence records), and the Defendant and defense counsel’s assertion as a result of the reproduction and viewing of black booms and video CDs

1. The defendant and his defense counsel in the summary of the argument are areas where the accident occurred is an area where people do not pass, the victim's act is presumed to have taken his own form intentionally to commit suicide, and the victim's act was committed on the day of the case, and therefore there was no fault on the day of the case, so there was a situation where there was a difference in friendly acid on the road. The victim was able to go away from the road. At the same time, the victim was her own form through the examination color, and only she was fluent and fluent in the direction of the defendant's progress, and it could not be predicted that there was a person subsequent to friendly acid.