However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 5, 2015, at around 23:56, the Defendant walked over two lanes and three lanes of the above road while under the influence of alcohol on the roads in front of the B building in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, the Defendant was under the order of 112 to the effect that a drunk person walks a road and takes measures to ensure the risk of walking the road, and he was under the order of 112 attached to the Gwangju Mine Police Station C District Team, the Defendant would get off the road at a safe place on the other hand.

“In the face of the police,” “in the face of the police”;

느그들이 뭣인데 이러냐.

“Along with sound, D’s face was taken twice as drinking, and continued to be taken on the back seat of the patrol vehicle and was assaulted by drinking D’s face in the course of getting out of C’s seat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives and bodies of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the police of the accused and the interrogation of the suspect by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the handling of damaged parts photographs, 112 reported cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the criminal defendant has led to his/her offense, has repented his/her mistake, has deposited one million won for the reason why he/she was damaged, and the degree of violence or obstruction in the performance of official duties is serious;

It is difficult to see that there is no criminal conviction against the defendant, and that there is no criminal conviction against the defendant, and it is decided as ordered within the scope of one month to eight months (type 1 of the crime obstructing the performance of official duties among the crimes obstructing the performance of official duties).