2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, ① the victim D consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court to consistently held that the Defendant was at the time of gathering the victim’s head and face and head.

In the original trial, F, a witness, also considered that the defendant is about to take the head of the victim's head and to take the face of the victim's face in drinking.

In full view of the fact that the statement of the victim corresponds to the statement of the victim, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant has assaulted the victim as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment below. Thus, the defendant's assertion of

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.