However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On October 5, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2018.

(2) On December 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) from the Busan District Court Branch Branch of the Busan District Court, on October 5, 2018, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Busan District Court Branch of the Busan District Court, on December 18, 2017.

In this regard, the Defendant reported the Defendant through C through B, which led to the misunderstanding of the Defendant’s awareness about C’s religion.

After that, on February 2018, the Defendant sent approximately 0.14g of opphonephones to F free of charge at the “Eel” parking lot located in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, 2018, and was admitted to the Busan National Police Station (Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office No. 2018 type No. 12598), and was subjected to a detention investigation, the Defendant was able to keep the above C in the public by means of false information with his upper line to the investigation agency.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 12, 2018, the Defendant, as the superintendent of the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, was detained due to the suspicion that he/she delivered phiphones to F and G free of charge at the criminal office of the Busan High Police Station located in 264, as the superintendent of the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, requested a police officer in charge to hold an interview with the police officer in charge, and asked the police officer to ask for the reasons for the interview. On February 12, 2018, the Defendant asked the police officer to answer the question of the police officer who asked for the reasons for the interview, and informed him/her of the facts related to narcotics of the above C.

However, there was no fact that the Defendant received philophones free of charge from the above C at the above date, time and place.

Accordingly, the defendant has the above C penal punishment.