However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 2, 2020, around 00:45, the Defendant was boarding a cab vehicle operated by the victim B in the vicinity of the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, and was working as if he would pay the taxi charge normally.

However, at the time, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the taxi fee.

As above, the Defendant acquired property benefits by deceiving the victim, thereby failing to pay 12,000 won of taxi fares.

2. On February 2, 2020, at around 01:10, the Defendant: (a) sent to the entrance of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu D apartment; (b) the victim F of the Incheon Samsan Police Station E District, who was called out after receiving 112 reports on the unclaimed cars specified in paragraph (1); and (c) the Defendant: (a) deemed that he was the reporter B; (b) “YY Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, which

Accordingly, the defendant openly insulting victims, and interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of their duties on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B, F, and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 347(1) of the relevant Criminal Act concerning the crime, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply to concurrent crimes;