beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.02.12 2014고단1920

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of eight months in the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 16 of the same year.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. On May 15, 2009, the Defendant: (a) falsely told the victim, “The acquisition tax and registration tax shall be paid at the expense of dividing shares in inheritance; (b) it entered at the last cost; and (c) 13 million won shall be entered at the expense of making a loan; and (d) even if the Defendant received the above money from the victim, he did not intend to use it as the expense of making a contract without delay; (b) notwithstanding that the Defendant did not intend to pay acquisition tax and registration tax, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 13 million won from the Defendant’s bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant.

B. On August 17, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement that “the Defendant shall pay the Defendant fees to the associate attorney by resolving the loan of financial rights,” but the Defendant did not intend to use the above money as attorney fee even if it was received from the victim, and intended to use it for personal purposes, the Defendant, despite having the intent to use it for the above personal purposes, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 1 million from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant from the victim on the same day.

2. Crimes against victims G;

A. A. On April 30, 2009, the Defendant: (a) was a transmitting instructor with Ansan-si 5, Ansan-si Masan-ri; (b) was made by phone calls from the victim to appoint a lawyer to register the split-off of the inheritance share on the land owned by the husband who died of D; (c) was falsely made to send KRW 6,500,000 at the expense of appointment; (d) however, even if the Defendant received money from the victim, the inheritance share is divided.