A. On June 15, 2017, at around 06:30, the Plaintiff: (a) was driving along a road of one-lane prior to the E bridge located in Busan, Seoan-gu, Busan, from the discharge area to the industrial distribution complex on the area of the distribution complex; (b) the Plaintiff was faced with the right side of the H driver’s IF of the H driving vehicle, where F was in the course of driving the vehicle to board a G vehicle parked on the road (hereinafter “first vehicle”); and (c) the Plaintiff was faced with the part on the right side of the H driver’s IF vehicle (hereinafter “second vehicle”) and was faced with the part on the right side side (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the right saves and the saves of abandonment.

C. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the first vehicle, and the Defendant C Federation (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is the mutual aid business operator who entered into an automobile mutual aid contract with the second vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2 to 4, Gap evidence 7-1 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Comprehensively taking account of the above recognition of liability for damages and the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 7-1 to 8, F, a driver of the first vehicle, has been negligent in neglecting the duty of care to safely open the door of the vehicle so as not to cause any accident by properly examining the surrounding traffic conditions in the case of opening the door of the vehicle in order to board a vehicle parked on the road, and H, a driver of the second vehicle, was negligent in neglecting the duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle so that if he discovered in advance the bicycle driving along the road, he would not go against the bicycle and the bicycle, thereby neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle. Thus, since F and H's above negligence concurrently go against the accident of this case, F and the insurer of the first vehicle and the Defendants, a mutual aid business operator of the second vehicle, shall jointly cooperate with the plaintiff.