If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 11:00 on January 5, 2013, the Defendant found in order to receive KRW 40 million from the representative director office of the company D, which is located in Geumsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant, while making a dispute with the victim E (the age of 55) and the victim E, called "indubing tax base" and "indubing tax base of the amount of money" and "indubing the victim's bat, he was faced with the victim's fat, thereby causing injury to the victim for about 14 days, such as chest fat, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's assertion of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the provisional payment order does not have any dancing on his/her body.

The victim made a statement consistent with the facts charged in the investigation agency and the court. ① The witness F, G, and H consistently made it clear that the defendant and the victim have consistently carried, pushedly carried, and fighting one another, and they made a statement about who entered the representative office first. However, the defendant and the victim did not live one another, but did not live one another on a two occasions.

The fact that the Defendant and the victim appeared to have franced, and the (C) H made a statement that the representative director at the time when the Defendant and the victim first raised their words and franced their body, and that the victim was faced with the francing office at the time when she reined, and the victim was franced, and that he was franced with the Defendant’s francing. When H went to the office, the Defendant and the victim re-sated the francing, and then re-sated with H after entering the F and G, in light of the fact that all the statements made by F, G, and H can be received, the above statement alone is inconsistent with the above statement.