1. The Defendant is a person who works in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a single-person, and the victim stated in the facts charged with the Defendant and the victim indicated in the facts charged are the same person, who became aware of at least 11:00 on July 26, 201.

A false statement was made to the extent that “The three-time calls begin, would be 10 million won or more, 8.5 million won or more per every ten days, she shall be 12 shesheshesheshesheet and 13 she takes up KRW 10.2 million or more.”

However, in fact, the Defendant, while operating several different accounts at the time, intended to pay the said money to the victim for a life, even if he/she received the money from the victim, and had no intention or ability to pay the said money to the victim for a life with a mutual aid scheme of another fraternity. In short, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the said money to the victim for a KRW 20.4 million at maturity.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim and deceiving him from the victim on July 26, 201, transferred the sum of KRW 5,100,000,000 to the D Bank Account (E) in the name of D Bank in C (E) in the name of C (E) and then, from that time until October 28, 2011, is the details of the payment of the 18-day deposit in the attached Table 18-day deposit from that time.

A total of KRW 20,400,000 was remitted over 11 times, such as the statement.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On August 1, 2011, at a place where no known is known, the Defendant made a false statement that reads a telephone to the victim at a place where it cannot be known, and that reads “4 times of entrance into the fourth unit, in which there is a four-time number system, and in which 8,500,000 won should be returned to 12 times every 10 days, and KRW 10,200,000 should be returned to 13 times.”

However, in fact, the Defendant, while operating several different accounts at the time, had an intention to pay the said money to the victim with a single-name “comprehion” even if receiving the said money from the victim, and had no intention or ability to pay the said money to the victim at the maturity.