However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Category C cargo vehicles.

On April 29, 2017, around 17:06, the Defendant got 287 new engineers to turn to the left from the edge of the new engineer distance.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph after checking whether he/she is a person to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, due to negligence in the course of the vehicle driving in violation of the signal even though the vehicle driving signal is red, the victim D(56 years old), the victim E(n, 35 years old), the victim F(n, 62 years old), the victim G(31 years old), the victim H(n, 27 years old) was placed in front of the above cargo vehicle, and the victim I (5 years old) I (5 years old) who was in the signal waiting in order to turn out the signal to the new engineer distance from the distance on the side of the above cargo, the victim I (5 years old) who continued to drive the vehicle driving in front of the passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence sustained injury to the victim D, such as an injury to frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting.