A. The punishment of the court below (unfair imprisonment with labor for three months) is too unreasonable.

B. The title trust relationship of this case between I and S, who is a truster of mistake of facts (based on embezzlement and unjust sentencing) is a party to a sales contract for the land and building of this case, and I concluded a sales contract with the seller, and only the registration was directly transferred from the seller to S, who is the trustee, and in such a relation, S, who is a trustee, is in the position of a person who keeps another's property. Thus, the defendant's act of arbitrarily disposing of the real estate of this case in collusion with S, who is the trustee, constitutes embezzlement, the court below acquitted him of the charge of embezzlement among the facts charged of this case. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

The above sentence sentenced by the court below on unreasonable sentencing is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

가. 검사의 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 ⑴ 공소사실의 요지 ㈎ 2012. 9.경 횡령 피고인은 2012. 9.경 W으로부터 5,000만 원을 빌리기 위하여 피해자 I이 S에게 명의신탁한 포항시 북구 T 대지 및 3층 건물(이하 ‘이 사건 부동산’이라 한다)을 위 W에게 가등기해 주기로 마음먹고, S에게 “사채업자 W이 대출금 5억 원을 떠안고 이 사건 부동산을 가지고 가는 대신에 3,000만 원을 주기로 했다.”라고 말하며 가등기 관련 서류를 요구하였고, S은 이를 승낙한 뒤 피고인에게 인감증명서, 주민등록초본을 건네주었다.

On September 17, 2012, the Defendant made a provisional registration of the right to claim the transfer of ownership on September 17, 2012 with regard to the instant real estate in the Daegu District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch of the District Court on September 17, 2012, by setting the trade promise as the grounds for registration.

Accordingly, the defendant is S.