In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the fine shall be respectively imposed.

1. On August 1, 2016, the Defendants committed the joint crime of the Defendants: (a) around 23:20 on the ground that the Defendants stated that the “Esing practice place” located in Cheongju-si Office D, the victim F (43 years of age) and the victim G (49 years of age) said the Defendants “if the Defendants are not on credit, they cannot sing the victim’s face.” (b) Defendant A was drinking about five times the victim F face, and Defendant B was faced with the wall by pushing the victim G with the wall to the wall.

As a result, the Defendants jointly caused the victim F to inflict injury on the victim G on the satise of the satise of the face requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and on the satise of the satise of the satise of the satise of the satise requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, upon receipt of the date, time, place, and report set forth in paragraph 1, arrested A as a current offender, the police officer of the Cheongju District Police Station H District of the Cheongju District of the Cheongju District of the Cheongju District of the Cheongju District of the Cheongju District of the Cheongju District of the Cheongju District of the Cheongju District.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Each police statement made to F, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) B of the Criminal Act: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of each of the selective fines for punishment (the crime committed by the Defendants under the influence of alcohol is the crime committed by the Defendants, the mistake is divided, the result of damage is relatively weak, the agreement between the victims of the injury in the case of Defendant B and the absence of the same criminal record for the last ten years); and

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant B), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act, respectively, shall be confined in the workhouse.