전세권설정등기말소
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to the real estate stated in the attached list, Defendant B shall be liable for the registration office of the Seoul Eastern District Court.
The plaintiff asserts the facts as the cause of the claim of this case, and between the plaintiff, the defendant C and the Seoul Credit Guarantee Foundation pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act, it shall be deemed that the defendant C and the Seoul Credit Guarantee Foundation have led to confession, and the plaintiff and B may recognize the facts of the above assertion as it is by the statement in the evidence Nos. 1 through 5.
Therefore, Defendant B’s right to claim for the return of the deposit for lease on a deposit basis is extinguished, and Defendant B is obligated to implement the procedure for the cancellation registration of the lease on a deposit basis completed on April 18, 201 by the Songdong District Court in Songdong District Court in Seoul, Songdong District Court (Seoul District Court), and Defendant C and Seoul Credit Guarantee Foundation have the obligation to accept the registration of cancellation of the lease on a deposit basis. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for this case is accepted for reasons. It is so decided as per Disposition.