대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Around August 4, 2014, the Plaintiff lent KRW 10 million to the Defendant on or around October 11, 2014, respectively, and separately leased KRW 20 million to the Defendant. The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s leading and the Defendant paid KRW 18.4 million for August 8, 201, which the Defendant had to pay from the “16 Number System,” which is the cause of the Plaintiff, (= KRW 2.3 million x 8.4 million), and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff lent money to the Defendant. However, the Defendant actually lent money from the Plaintiff, and the Defendant only lent a passbook to D, and the Defendant only lent money to the Defendant. There is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff lent money to the Defendant, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff lent money to the Defendant.
On the other hand, at the first date for pleading, the plaintiff also stated that D was not in contact with D at present on the premise that D, who is not the defendant, was an actual leader.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.