The punishment sentenced by the court below (10 months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is recognized that the defendant should support his family as a domestic first offender, the fact that he received daily allowances and took part in the crime, and actively cooperate in the investigation.

However, in this case, the defendant's transfer or acquisition of the means of access used for the so-called Bosing crime, and the participation period is close to two months, and the degree of participation in 120 means of access is not minor.

The circumstances where it is difficult to arrest the entire organization or to recover the amount of fraud due to the nature of the Bosing crime committed in the form of the occupied organization, the adverse effect of the Bosing crime on the whole society should also be considered.

In addition, considering the motive of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, the age, character and conduct of the Defendant, and criminal records as well as various other circumstances that form the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and pleadings, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.