However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On March 13, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Seoul Eastern District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 21:50 on May 26, 2020, the Defendant driven a DNA car owned by the Defendant while under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.091% from the section of approximately 9km from the public sewerage street located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front road located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the front road in Seongdong-gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements, records of measurements, and investigation report on the records of the control of drinking driving (report on the circumstances of drinking drivers);

1. Previous records before ruling: Application of criminal records, repeated statements and investigation reports (attached to summary orders)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( repeatedly considering the reason for discretionary mitigation);

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: A dangerous criminal who, by raising the possibility of traffic accidents, may cause the occurrence of a traffic accident, not only his/her life and family, but also his/her life and family, and the defendant has been punished three times as a fine by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act or a violation of the Road Traffic Act: A favorable circumstance in which the defendant is punished three times by a fine: The defendant repents and reflects his/her mistake: The defendant's age, character and behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions for sentencing specified in the arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc.