The Defendant, at around 20:00 on January 4, 2012, in the “DDag” located in Hadong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim E (the age of 48), if the Defendant was unable to faithfully perform his duties and, even if he borrowed money from the victim E (the age of 48), he would be able to repay the amount of KRW 4550,00 to the Defendant with a great amount of money.

‘Falsely speaking, the victim received cash of KRW 2.55 million from the same day on the same day as the loan, etc., and the defendant had the victim repay the personal debt of KRW 2 million with respect to the multi-party business who had been previously employed by the defendant, thereby having the victim acquire the financial profit equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. E’s statement of the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account details;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Selection of Fine;

1. Sentence of a fine not exceeding 1,000,000 won;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of suspended sentence;