However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 2013, the Defendant paid approximately KRW 1,50,000 to 5,00,000 won in return for the loan arrangement to Dog Capital, our society social, modern Switzerland Savings Bank, etc., and 7,50,000 won in return for the loan arrangement. The Defendant paid the above debt to Dogman and Doker through the above Doker in a lump sum, with a temporary increase in credit rating, used the above Doker in order to receive the loan simultaneously from several lending companies. The Defendant repaid the Defendant’s loan under the name of Doker in the name of the Defendant, and the Defendant was the credit rating at which Doker can receive the loan from Dok Life Insurance Co., Ltd. in the future of the victim.

On the 18th day of the same month, the Defendant borrowed from the victim and 50 million won to the interest rate of 8% per annum on the non-motor vehicle parked in front of the 107 U.S. Seogdong-gun, Gyeongdong-gun, and prepared a loan transaction agreement and an application for the loan under the terms and conditions that are repaid after one year. The Defendant submitted to the victim through the above Brok, stating the terms and conditions of the loan as “if the loan is carried out at another financial institution on the 5th day prior to the enforcement of the terms and conditions of the loan as of the 19th day of the same month at the time when the loan is performed, and the 15th day after the enforcement of the terms and conditions of the loan, the Defendant stated the loan application

However, on the same day, the Defendant was expected to obtain a loan of KRW 6622,00,000 from the Korean bank, and KRW 60,000,000,000,000 from the Korean Agency. Thus, according to the above commitment submitted by the Defendant, the Defendant was required to immediately repay the loan to the victim. However, the Defendant was scheduled to repay the existing loan with the money borrowed from the victim, the Korean bank, and the Korean Agency Standards Dadrid Bank, and to make a stock investment with the remaining money after paying KRW 7.5 million in return for the loan arrangement, and KRW 4,00,000,000,000,000 from the monthly income at that time.