However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 14:00 on September 30, 2012, the Defendant received compensation of KRW 500,000 from the victim C (the age of 71) for the reason that he was found to have been dead by the president of the F General Affairs Center in the mountain, but the Defendant renounced it as the president of the door and received special treatment from him, after gathering the son’s disease, which is a dangerous object in the region, and frighted to the victim’s chest, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as chest and frying, which need to be treated for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (the purport that the defendant was suffering from the illness of the defendant, and that the defendant was the victim of the disease of the defendant);

1. The witness C and G’s respective legal statements (the defendant was the victim who slandered against the defendant, and the victim was the victim who was the victim, and the victim was the victim, and the defendant did not have any intention to inflict an injury on the victim. However, in full view of each evidence such as the witness C and G’s legal statement, especially the consistency, physical strength, rationality, and the degree of credibility in light of the degree of the testimony in this court and the investigative agency’s statement in this court, it can be recognized that the defendant was the victim while the defendant was the victim in a dispute, and thus, the defendant could have been the victim's intentional injury to the defendant).

1. Each injury diagnosis letter (C), each injury entry and discharge confirmation certificate (C), and the Defendant’s emergency medical service clinical records had a fluorite face with the victim’s chest, and the victim alleged that the disease was not suffered an injury requiring six weeks’ medical treatment due to the instant case. However, in light of each of the evidence, the victim’s statement that the fluor was faced with the chest and continued to fluor, and the victim’s statement, a copy of each injury diagnosis letter prepared by the doctor H, a confirmation letter of admission discharge, and opinion letter, etc., the victim’s criminal facts are the same as the fluoral disease.